Narrative
Trust can be repaired
Critical dependency recovering through visible stewardship and deeper security funding.
View GitHub repoLegacy recovery
A legacy dependency does not need a rebrand. It needs better governance, faster response, and visible budget.
Operator Scenarios
Available
Injects a critical incident into a fast-growth repo and flips the agent verdict from review to block.
Available
Shows how increasing the security budget and audit coverage can move a high-growth repo into the allow range.
Live now
Demonstrates that operational discipline can rehabilitate a legacy dependency's trust profile.
Narrative
Critical dependency recovering through visible stewardship and deeper security funding.
View GitHub repoSignal composition
Security Budget
57Stake Depth
51Audit Coverage
72Maintainer Responsiveness
82Incident Pressure
33Adoption Confidence
92Agent Verdict
The repo is usable, but recent signal quality or market depth is not strong enough for unsupervised adoption.
Threshold 74Provenance
Real repo with explicit seeded signals to illustrate systemic risk.
Source linkRecent events
Maintainer response time normalized
Mar 13, 2026, 2:58 PMFresh stewards and budget commitments raised the repo back toward the allow threshold.
Maintainer queue drifted upward
Mar 9, 2026, 10:45 AMSlower response times pushed the repo further into review territory.